Realme Narzo 60 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M34 5G: A Spec Comparison

This article will be comparing two 2023 smartphones that were launched just two months back by leading smartphone makers – Realme and Samsung.

Let’s compare the Realme Narzo 60 5G with Samsung’s Galaxy M34 5G smartphone, and find the best smartphone device among the two.

Realme Narzo 60 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M34 5G


Dimensions 159.8 x 72.9 x 7.9 mm 161.7 x 77.2 x 8.8 mm
Weight 182 gm 208 gm


Network Connectivity 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G
Wi-Fi Yes, Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac with Dual Band Support Yes, Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac with Dual Band Support and Wi-Fi Direct
Bluetooth Yes Yes, Version 5.3


Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Chipset
Primary Clock Speed 2.2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Operating System Android 13 based Realme UI 4.0 Android 13 based One UI 5.1
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G68


Storage Options 8GB/128GB and 8GB/256GB 6GB/128GB and 8GB/128GB


Display Type Super AMOLED Display Super AMOLED Display
Screen Size 6.43” 6.5”
Screen Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Refresh Rate 90Hz 120Hz


Rear Camera 64MP + 2MP Dual Camera Setup 50MP + 8MP + 2MP Triple Camera Setup
Front Camera 16MP 13MP


Fingerprint Sensor Yes, Under Display, Optical Fingerprint Sensor Yes, Side Mounted Fingerprint Sensor
Accelerometer Yes Yes
Proximity Sensor Yes Yes
Gyroscope Yes Yes
Barometer No No
Compass Yes Yes


Battery Backup 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging Features 33W Wired Fast Charging Feature 25W Wired Fast Charging Feature


Color Variant Mars Orange and Cosmic Black Midnight Blue, Prism Silver and Waterfall Blue

Of the two smartphones in this comparison, Samsung’s Galaxy M34 5G smartphone is the best when its overall specifications are compared to the Narzo 60 5G smartphone.

The Galaxy M34 5G smartphone is powered by the brand’s own Exynos 1280 chipset and has a primary clock speed of 2.4GHz. The Narzo 60 5G, on the other hand, comes equipped with the Dimensity 6020 chipset with its primary cores clocked at 2.2GHz. Comparing the two, the Galaxy M34 5G smartphone will be able to offer a better performance.

Both devices have the same Super AMOLED display panels with similar screen resolutions(1080 x 2400 pixels). The Galaxy smartphone, however, has a slightly larger display screen(6.5″), supporting a faster refresh rate(120Hz).

Coming to the cameras, while Realme’s Narzo 60 5G smartphone has a dual rear camera setup, the Galaxy M34 5G from Samsung sports a triple camera unit at its rear. It should be noted that the Narzo smartphone has a better main camera(64MP) than the primary camera offered on the Galaxy smartphone(50MP). The two devices also have an additional 2MP camera and the Galaxy smartphone comes with an 8MP ultrawide lens too.

To add, the Realme Narzo smartphone has a better 16MP selfie camera to offer than the 13MP front-facing camera featured on the Galaxy device.

Finally, about the batteries, the Narzo smartphone packs a 5000 mAh battery, whereas Samsung’s Galaxy M34 5G is backed by a larger 6000 mAh battery. But, when it comes to the fast charge features, Realme’s Narzo 60 5G supports a 33W faster fast charge feature than the 25W charging support given on the Galaxy M34 5G.

So, as pointed out, there are places where Realme’s Narzo 60 5G smartphone outperforms the Galaxy M34 5G and vice versa. Even if this is the case, when looking at the overall specifications offered, the Galaxy M34 5G has turned out to be the better smartphone when compared to the Realme Narzo 60 5G.

Readers like you help support The Tech Outlook. When you make a purchase using links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. We cannot guarantee the Product information shown is 100% accurate and we advise you to check the product listing on the original manufacturer website. Thetechoutlook is not responsible for price changes carried out by retailers. The discounted price or deal mentioned in this item was available at the time of writing and may be subject to time restrictions and/or limited unit availability. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of, Inc. or its affiliates Read More


This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More